Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!torsqnt!tmsoft!masnet!canremote!bradley.grigor
From: bradley.grigor@canremote.uucp (BRADLEY GRIGOR)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Software Carousel and the
Message-ID: <90020407120021@masnet.uucp>
Date: 4 Feb 90 11:31:00 GMT
Organization: Canada Remote Systems Limited, Mississauga, ON, Canada
Lines: 17

>>Date: 02-02-90 (12:29)          Number: 16653     Msg #26 out of 77 *
>>  To: STEVEK@HP-PTP.HP.COM      Refer#: 16521   
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>From: MARK FREEDMAN               Read: NO 
>>Subj: Software Carousel and the   Conf: (84) U-IBMPC

Mark, are messages addressed this way really getting through OK?  
I've always been replacing the Reply TO: address with ALL, since I 
figured either PCBoard would screw up the rather complex USENET 
address and/or USENET GATEWAY would ignore "personal" mail (i.e. 
anything other than ALL or USENET GATEWAY).  But if your way is 
working, it sure is a lot more convenient!  Let me know, thanks.

bradley.grigor@canremote.uucp  :  ALEX is coming to Toronto in April.
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada     :  TelePoker will be there - will YOU?
---
 ~ DeLuxe 1.11a20 #4613  Don't worry: the answer's at the back of the book.