Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.programmer:12086 comp.sys.mac:47754
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!eutrc3!rcbaem
From: rcbaem@eutrc3.urc.tue.nl (Ernst <pooh> Mulder)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: A call for "3D look" (a la Next) interface guidelines from Apple
Keywords: Human Interface
Message-ID: <1461@eutrc3.urc.tue.nl>
Date: 1 Feb 90 15:01:47 GMT
References: <7334@tank.uchicago.edu> <38207@apple.Apple.COM>
Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Lines: 17


 Okay, maybe the 1 bit screen-depth of most Macs is a mayor drawback
for producing a NeXT look, but I've seen some nice alternate window
implementations. If anyone of you is a musician, you probably know
the alternative version of Performer. (A MIDI recorder/editor) This
program's windows are not NeXT-like, but are most certainly very
good-looking :) I use Performer quite a lot and still didn't get
bored by its alternative windows. (This version of Performer is called
the Experimental Version)

 Once, on the net, I saw a little Application (Or was it an init) which
shows how the NeXT 'finder' looks. It had a nice implementation of
'depth' shadows too. But indeed, the NeXT windows are most certainly
the nicest windows I've seen so far...

 Ernst.
   >