Xref: utzoo news.groups:17187 talk.philosophy.misc:3508 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!convex!cash From: cash@convex.com (Peter Cash) Newsgroups: news.groups,sci.philosophy.meta,talk.philosophy.misc Subject: Re: SCI.PHILOSOPHY.OBJECTIVISM Message-ID: <5056@convex.convex.com> Date: 1 Feb 90 15:50:52 GMT References: <3284@iitmax.IIT.EDU> <3285@iitmax.IIT.EDU> <9442@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <2018@cjsa.WA.COM> Sender: news@convex.com Followup-To: news.groups Organization: Convex Computer Corporation; Richardson, TX Lines: 36 In article <2018@cjsa.WA.COM> jeff@cjsa.WA.COM (Jeffery Small) writes: > >Philosophy n.; >...dictionary definition deleted >Science n.; >...dictionary definition deleted > >Definitions above from: "Merriam-Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary" - 1961 > > >Clearly, unless one wishes to rewrite the definitions and thereby distort >the meaning of any of the above terms, philosophy (as defined; often in >opposition to how it is practiced) is and must be considered a science. Clearly, this is a lesson in how a little (very little) knowledge can be a dangerous thing. The dictionary is a good place for finding superficial information about words; don't expect profundity or keen insight there. And don't expect to find an ultimate court of appeal; dictionaries sometimes disagree, and sometimes they're wrong. When Webster's talks about philosophy as a "science", "science" is surely used in the very loosest sense. Science is empirical; to be scientific, a question must--at least in theory--be capable of resolution by experiment. Modern philosophy deals with precisely those questions that cannot--*even in theory*--ever be resolved through experiment. If one can devise an experiment that would solve a question, then that question is not a philosophical one. Philosophy is therefore not "scientific". I do hope you Objectivists get your very own newsgroup soon. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Die Welt ist alles, was Zerfall ist. | Peter Cash | (apologies to Ludwig Wittgenstein) | cash@convex ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~