Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!fornax!miron From: miron@fornax.UUCP (Miron Cuperman ) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: How to decide -- sci or talk. Message-ID: <264@fornax.UUCP> Date: 1 Feb 90 23:28:37 GMT References: <7363@tank.uchicago.edu> <13437@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <257@fornax.UUCP> Reply-To: miron@lccr.UUCP (Miron Cuperman (Jones/Paul)) Organization: School of Computing Sceience, SFU, B.C., Canada Lines: 12 In article torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen) writes: > >It is possible to have the votes simultaneously if a person can vote > >on one proposal independently from the other. > Yes, I didn't think of this. Still, I think we shouldn't have >simultaneous votes since some ardent "sci" enthusiasts might simply >refuse to compromise their convictions by also voting for "talk". Ok. I concede the point. The sci vote should be first since it is harder. What is the procedure for the call for votes? When can one post it? Miron Cuperman