Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!decwrl!pyramid!ctnews!unix386!garyt From: garyt@unix386.Convergent.COM (Gary Tse) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: How to decide -- sci or talk. Message-ID: <822@unix386.Convergent.COM> Date: 2 Feb 90 01:19:21 GMT References: <7363@tank.uchicago.edu> <13437@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <257@fornax.UUCP> Reply-To: garyt@ios.convergent.com (Gary Tse) Organization: Society for the Rescue and Sustenance of the Other Six 'Possums Lines: 17 In article torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen) writes: > Still, I think we shouldn't have >simultaneous votes since some ardent "sci" enthusiasts might simply >refuse to compromise their convictions by also voting for "talk". >Those of us who want an objectivism group first and foremost would >prefer not to put the "sci" diehards in this difficult position. I find it amusing that objectivists would be willing to compromise on finding the right hierarchy in order to push through a vote on the newsgroup. Just an observation. -- Gary Tse, garyt@ios.convergent.com || ..!pyramid!ctnews!ios!garyt tse@soda.berkeley.edu || ..!ucbvax!soda!tse tse@cup.portal.com /*blecht*/ || ..!sun!cup.portal.com!tse "Sorta like Scientology without the fees." -- Evan Leibovitch