Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!shlump.nac.dec.com!quik07.enet.dec.com!burch
From: burch@quik07.enet.dec.com (Ben Burch)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: talk.religion.pagan (UNMODERATED)
Keywords: pagan, unmoderated
Message-ID: <8053@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Date: 2 Feb 90 18:35:32 GMT
References: <464@everex.UUCP> <4087@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Sender: newsdaemon@shlump.nac.dec.com
Reply-To: burch@quik07.enet.dec.com (Ben Burch)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 15


I agree that we need a newsgroup, and although I earlier (this morning)
brought up the subject of an alt.religion.pagan group, I am appalled
at the connectivity of the altnet.  Many times messages are confined
to some small provice of sites, but (a paradox) replies to them spread
far and wide.

The question (for the net.gods) is;  Can we propose an unmoderated
newsgroup so close on the heels of the defeat of a moderated one of
similar description?

If so, I am all for it, and wonder who would be willing to do the work
(and take the abuse of Certain People) of collecting the votes and
publishing the results? (For a variety of reasons, I cannot, now,
do this.)