Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!tank!iitmax!demodsb
From: demodsb@iitmax.IIT.EDU (David Bombardier)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: How to decide -- sci or talk.
Message-ID: <3320@iitmax.IIT.EDU>
Date: 3 Feb 90 02:07:40 GMT
References: <7363@tank.uchicago.edu> <13437@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <264@fornax.UUCP> <XOH1EUCxds8@ficc.uu.net>
Reply-To: demodsb@iitmax.iit.edu (David Bombardier)
Organization: Illinois Institute of Technology
Lines: 16

In article <XOH1EUCxds8@ficc.uu.net> jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) writes:
>In article <264@fornax.UUCP>, miron@fornax.UUCP (Miron Cuperman ) writes:
> 
>> The sci vote should be first since it is
>> harder.  
>
>
>But talk was proposed first.

Actually, sci.philosophy.objectivism was proposed first.  Someone on
sci.philosophy.tech suggested it to Bob Stubblefield.  It wasn't until after
discussion on sci.philosophy.objectivism began (although there wasn't a formal
call for discussion) that talk.philosophy.objectivism was proposed.

-- David Bombardier
   demodsb@iitmax.iit.edu