Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!ficc!morrison
From: morrison@ficc.uu.net (Brad Morrison)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: The Topic that wouldn't go away (re: sci vs. talk)
Keywords: Objectivism, philosophy, sci.*
Message-ID: <8XH1_PFxds13@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 2 Feb 90 23:23:39 GMT
References: <3284@iitmax.IIT.EDU> <3285@iitmax.IIT.EDU> <9442@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <7346@tank.uchicago.edu> <1990Feb1.005817.1786@everexn.uucp> <38268@apple.Apple.COM> <88511@looking.on.ca>
Reply-To: morrison@ficc.uu.net (Brad Morrison)
Organization: Ferranti International Controls Corp. (NYSEG SCADA)
Lines: 58






                                   Top Ten
       Reasons Why The Objectivism Group Should Be in The Sci Hierarchy
                             Or Inedible Leftovers

10. There's not enough room in alt!



 9. Talk group won't lend enough dignity to my flames!



 8. Rancid pork!



 7. Elvis doesn't get talk groups at his site!



 6. Vmsnet sites threatened to alias talk.politics.objectivism to rec.aquaria!



 5. Salmonella-infested bean curd!



 4. Talk group would generate insufficient controversy for UseNET's
    grist mill!


 3. Spam!



 2. "talk" is just one too many characters to type!



And the number one reason...



 1.  Ayn Rand would have wanted it that way!



--
Brad Morrison                (713) 274-5449 | My MEATLOAF is RUINED--because
Ferranti International Controls Corporation | my kitchen lacks a FULL STREAMS
morrison@ficc.uu.net                        | IMPLEMENTATION!!!
morrison@ficc.lonestar.org                  |      -- Zippy (Am I POSIX yet?)