Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ibmchs!auschs!cello!d75!awdprime!fenway!mjones
From: mjones@fenway.uucp (Mike Jones)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: The Topic that wouldn't go away (re: sci vs. talk)
Keywords: enough already
Message-ID: <1426@awdprime.UUCP>
Date: 2 Feb 90 18:04:50 GMT
References: <3284@iitmax.IIT.EDU> <3285@iitmax.IIT.EDU> <9442@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <7346@tank.uchicago.edu> <1990Feb1.005817.1786@everexn.uucp> <38268@apple.Apple.COM>
Sender: news@awdprime.UUCP
Reply-To: ibmps2.uucp!aix!mjones (Mike Jones)
Organization: IBM DSD, Kingston
Lines: 11

Since I seem to recall that the original proposal was for a talk. group and
the only real opposition I have seen was of the "no, it should be sci.!"
type, isn't is appropriate to have a call for votes for t.p.o? There has
certainly been enough discussion about s.p.o that one of its proponents
could, if he wishes, call for votes on that, too, but that's an entirely
independent issue. 

Mike Jones		|  Oh, these computers. They're so naughty.
AIX Kernel Development	|  I could just *pinch* them.
Kingston, NY		|			- Marvin Martian
.!uunet!ibmps2!aix!mjones