Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU!gsh7w From: gsh7w@astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg S. Hennessy) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: SCI.philosophy.objectivism Keywords: *philosophical* discussions, not lame autobiographical ramblings Message-ID: <1990Feb4.015056.26680@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Date: 4 Feb 90 01:50:56 GMT References: <11909@goofy.megatest.UUCP> <7434@tank.uchicago.edu> <7821@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <7450@tank.uchicago.edu> Sender: news@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Reply-To: gsh7w@astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg S. Hennessy) Organization: University of Virginia, Charlottesville Lines: 18 In article <7450@tank.uchicago.edu> rwt1@tank.uchicago.edu (Robert Tracinski) writes: # That's one reason I support placement in the #sci hierarchy--it would enable us to point to the charter, as well as to the #general nature of the sci groups in order to establish that such postings are #inappropriate. The same thing was said and tried with sci.skeptic. It was a dismal failure in the attempt to stop inappropiate (according to the charter) postings. Why would SPO be different? If the reason for being in sci is to stop inappropiate postings, then we need a new reason. -Greg Hennessy, University of Virginia USPS Mail: Astronomy Department, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475 USA Internet: gsh7w@virginia.edu UUCP: ...!uunet!virginia!gsh7w