Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!pyrnj!pyrdc!robecdc!root From: root@robecdc.UUCP (Super user) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: talk, not sci, for *.philosophy.objectivism (was Re: SPO CHARTER) Message-ID: <76@robecdc.UUCP> Date: 3 Feb 90 10:11:32 GMT References: <1990Jan27.003806.4520@twwells.com> <9001280011.AA28097@apee.ogi.edu> <1990Jan28.111136.6077@twwells.com> Reply-To: root@robecdc.UUCP (Super user) Organization: Robec Distributors Inc., D.C. Office Lines: 44 Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: talk, not sci, for *.philosophy.objectivism (was Re: SPO CHARTER) Summary: Expires: References: <1990Jan27.003806.4520@twwells.com> <9001280011.AA28097@apee.ogi.edu> <1990Jan28.111136.6077@twwells.com> Sender: Reply-To: root@robecdc.UUCP (Super user) Followup-To: Distribution: Organization: Robec Distributors Inc., D.C. Office Keywords: In article <1990Jan28.111136.6077@twwells.com> bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) writes: >In article <9001280011.AA28097@apee.ogi.edu> mehuld@apee.ogi.edu (Mehul Dave) writes: >: >A number of people have argued for sci on the basis that >: >discussions would be technical or that Objectivism is a science. >: >: No, people have argued that *philosophy* is a science and that Objectivism >: is a philosophy. Which leads me to, > >It says `established sciences'. > There is a way to settle this, is the "Science of Objectivist Philosophy" a BS program at MIT? As us 'dumb ole cuntry boys' would say: Scince = READIN, RITIN, RITHMATIC Pour on oil, may the flames rise high. You will note that I include my phone number. If you wish to take issue take note. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -William A. Sneed uucp: ...!pyrdc!robecdc!ghost -Robec Dist. voice: (703) 631-4800 -Manassas, Va fax: (703) 631-4806 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Brain fried -- Core dumped ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The words you have just read are strictly my own and no one else's. They in no way should be construed as anything but my own personal opinion. Besides no one else would lay claim to them. :-) :-) :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------