Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!texbell!vector!attctc!rissa
From: rissa@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Patricia O Tuama)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Flames
Message-ID: <11311@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>
Date: 4 Feb 90 09:08:29 GMT
Organization: Lone Star Cafe
Lines: 26

In article <:OH1XWCxds8@ficc.uu.net> jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) writes:
>I realized my mistake and posted an apology.  

No, you apologized for your mistake in following up the wrong art- 
icle but you didn't apologize for what you said plus, as I recall, 
you posted your "apology" to sci.aquaria (although I could be wrong 
about the latter, you were cross-posting so many of your articles 
to s.a at the time).  

>			A practice you might
>consider adopting.

And you likewise, Jeff dear.  


I noticed, however, that you skipped right over my comments on your 
very peculiar notion of net.vigilanteeism.  Can I assume this means
you agree with what I said?

>What you're saying here strikes me as nothing more than net.vigi-
>lanteeism.  A lot of netters think you have some mighty unsavory 
>motives yourself, Jeff, for example, your efforts to undermine sci
>.aquaria by cross-posting your flames there.  Would you say that 
>other people would be justified in following you around the net, 
>warning other newsgroups about you because of the way you behaved 
>in this instance?