Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!srcsip!nic.MR.NET!thor.acc.stolaf.edu!seebs
From: seebs@thor.acc.stolaf.edu (The Laughing Prophet)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION -- talk.politics.gay
Keywords: homosexuality, flame_war
Message-ID: <11150@thor.acc.stolaf.edu>
Date: 5 Feb 90 13:01:04 GMT
References: <34015@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <2812@scicom.AlphaCDC.COM>
Reply-To: seebs@thor.stolaf.edu (The Laughing Prophet)
Organization: Followers of the Jigging Cat
Lines: 16

In article <2812@scicom.AlphaCDC.COM> rcw@scicom.UUCP (Robert White) writes:
>Why sanction it with a group?  Some may convincingly argue that
>talk.abortion is a legitimate discussion.  The validity of
>homosexuality discussion, IMHO, is not legitimate.

Then how about talk.morality.talk.morality?
The newsgroup where we discuss whether or not it is right to discuss whether
or not something is moral?
Maybe a new "meta" top-level? Then have meta.talk.politics.gay, where we
discuss whether or not ... oh nevermind.

>Robert C. White, Jr.        |  Read Red Fox, Stand Watie's Civil War Years
>The WhiteStar Corporation   |  in Indian Territory to find out what your
>rcw@scicom.alphacdc.com     |  history teacher never told you.

--SeebS--