Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!neat.cs.toronto.edu!omicron.cs.fsu.edu!fsucs.cs.fsu.edu!peterson
Newsgroups: news.groups
From: peterson@fsucs.cs.fsu.edu (Eric J Peterson)
Subject: Re: Moderation (Re: SCI.philosophy.objectivism)
Message-ID: <9002051724.AA27076@fsucs.cs.fsu.edu>
Reply-To: peterson@nu.cs.fsu.edu (Eric J Peterson)
Organization: Florida State University Computer Science Department
Date: 5 Feb 90 18:33:46 GMT
Lines: 21

In article <A_J1KB6xds13@ficc.uu.net>, peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
| Repetitive and
| voluminous discussion never reaching a conclusion is not a great advance over
| flaming.

Nor does it result in a *.philosophy.objectivism group ... :-)

Let's go with the current idea of the two-step vote, the first for Yay/Nay
on the creation, the second for Talk/Sci.  Seems to be the only diplomatic
way of solving the problem.

I see no problem with Bill Wells as the moderator of the proposed group,
and the traffic here so far in news.groups seems to warrant moderation.

Eric

-- 
  Eric J. Peterson <> peterson@nu.cs.fsu.edu <> uunet!nu.cs.fsu.edu!peterson
Florida State Univ * CS Systems Support Group * Room 011 Love * (904) 644-2296
       echo "This is not a pipe." | lpr -P laserjet; more ~/.disclaimer