Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!jeff From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Sci *and* Talk? (Re: How to decide -- sci or talk.) Message-ID: <1681@skye.ed.ac.uk> Date: 5 Feb 90 19:28:22 GMT References: <13468@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> Reply-To: jeff@aiai.UUCP (Jeff Dalton) Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland Lines: 10 In article peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes: >If both groups are going to be voted on, the question of moderation becomes >less important. The sci people would have a better chance of getting their >group passed if it was moderated, though, so it might be a good idea to try >it that way. Everyone wins. Not everyone. Some people want Objectivists to move certain postings out of certain other groups. A moderated group is almost completely useless from that point of view because a whole class of objectivists won't post to it.