Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!usfvax2!tct!chip
From: chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Arguments for SCI.philosophy.objectivism
Message-ID: <1990Feb5.135447.5447@tct.uucp>
Date: 5 Feb 90 13:54:47 GMT
References: <7444@tank.uchicago.edu>
Organization: ComDev/TCT, Sarasota, FL
Lines: 15

According to rwt1@tank.uchicago.edu (Robert Tracinski):
>The argument is over 3 questions.
>	1) Is philosophy a science?
>	2) Is Objectivism a philosophy?
>	3) Does philosophy belong in the sci hierarchy?

Actually, there is a fourth:
	4) Do controversial topics that tend to generate more heat
	   than light belong in talk?

This fourth question is the only one I feel confident in answering:
"Yes."
-- 
Chip Salzenberg at ComDev/TCT   <chip%tct@ateng.com>, <uunet!ateng!tct!chip>
          "The Usenet, in a very real sense, does not exist."