Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!rex!ames!amdahl!pyramid!voder!zok!wattres!steve
From: steve@wattres.UUCP (Steve Watt)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: results of *.philosophy.objectivism poll
Summary: A vote for talk.
Message-ID: <336@wattres.UUCP>
Date: 6 Feb 90 07:07:30 GMT
References: <1990Feb1.130934.29945@twwells.com>
Reply-To: steve@wattres.UUCP (Steve Watt)
Organization: Steven Watt, Consultant
Lines: 16

In article <1990Feb1.130934.29945@twwells.com> bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) writes:
->
->Furthermore, in order to satisfy that turkey and whoever else is
->ignorant enough to believe that I'd falsify the poll, I'm asking
->anyone who sent in a response which did not get counted or which
->got counted incorrectly to please post that fact along with


  I have been having difficulty with mail, but not news.

  My vote is for talk.philosophy.objectivism

-- 
Steve Watt
...!claris!wattres!steve           wattres!steve@claris.com also works.
Is rm -rf a way to eliminate high frequency interference?