Xref: utzoo news.groups:17424 alt.drugs:2364
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen
From: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.drugs
Subject: Re: soc.drugs
Message-ID: <2094@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Date: 7 Feb 90 14:22:41 GMT
References: <131328@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: GE Corp R&D Center, Schenectady NY
Lines: 12


  If a group is created to discuss drug issues, I think the term
"issues" should be in the name of the group, to make it clear that
discussion of where to get, how to use, and what it did still belongs in
alt.drugs. 

  I don't see any need for this group, but I certainly don't oppose it
as long as the name makes the purpose so clear that a manager can
understand at a glance.
-- 
bill davidsen	(davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM -or- uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen)
            "Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me