Path: utzoo!mnetor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!bridge2!jarthur!aqdata!sullivan
From: sullivan@aqdata.uucp (Michael T. Sullivan)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: soc.drugs
Message-ID: <1990Feb7.174223.16179@aqdata.uucp>
Date: 7 Feb 90 17:42:23 GMT
References: <19349@grebyn.com>
Organization: aQdata, Inc.  Western Region -- San Dimas, CA
Lines: 21

From article <19349@grebyn.com>, by rwilliam@grebyn.com (Roger Williams):
> In article <131328@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> williamt@sun.UUCP (William A. Turnbow) writes:
>>
>>	What does anyone think about the idea of a soc.drugs newsgroups?
>>
> Actually, I've been thinking for some time now that talk.drugs
> would be a good idea.  Articles on drugs have virtually taken
> over misc.legal and constitute a goodly portion of the traffic in
> talk.politics.misc.  The issue certainly appears suited for the
> "talk" hierarchy.  It's a single issue which seems to generate

How about misc.legal.drugs or talk.politics.drugs.  This will keep
out discussion of the practice of using drugs, which will make system
administrators happy and is why alt.drugs was put in alt in the first
place.  If you make it look like it is discussing the legal issues
surrounding drugs or the politics of drugs, you'll have a better shot
than something like rec.drugs.
-- 
Michael Sullivan          uunet!jarthur!aqdata!sullivan
aQdata, Inc.              sullivan@aqdata.uucp
San Dimas, CA             +1 714 599 9992