Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!psuecl!peg From: peg@psuecl.bitnet (PAUL E. GANTER) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: 1802 et al. Message-ID: <83243@psuecl.bitnet> Date: 3 Feb 90 16:55:38 GMT References: <3218@uceng.UC.EDU> <914@xroads.UUCP> <1874@neoucom.UUCP> <80541@psuecl.bitnet> <12991@cbnewsd.ATT.COM> Organization: Engineering Computer Lab, Pennsylvania State University Lines: 34 In article <12991@cbnewsd.ATT.COM>, knudsen@cbnewsd.ATT.COM (michael.j.knudsen) writes: >> available. What rumors from Commodore can't you believe? The one that >> says they have been selling a multitasking home computer with color >> graphics and a reasonably small OS for under $1000, and doing it for >> over 4 years? > > Nor can I resist pointing out the "rumor" that Radio Shack has been > selling a multitasking color grafix home computer with an OS > of about 24 to 32K bytes for about 6 years, and at half the > cost of an Amiga 500. Sheet! I had almost forgotten about it! You are right! > > It uses a 6809, the last and best of the 8-bitters, as an earlier > poster mentioned. That's the Color Computer running OS-9 from > Microware. The 6809 is almost as fast in tight corners as the 6502 > and a heck of a lot better C-language machine. THe 6502 is a little > too RISCy for high-leel languages. The system manager here is a big fan of the 6809, he first pointed out the CoCo with OS9. He has designed some impressive devices with the 6809 (data muxers, etc.) that make use of "multitasking". > Not to rag on the Amiga, since the above posting did not claim > that it was the *first* M-Tasking home machine. > Actually, both the Amigas and the Color Computers join forces > whenever someone from Microsoft or International BM points to > their PS2 and OS/2 systems and says you need $10000 worth of hardware > and 4 MB of software to do multitasking with windows. You mean I haven't been multitasking with my 1 Meg of RAM? I'll have to run out and buy that Model 80 with 4 Meg this afternoon! Paul