Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!paperboy!husc6!m2c!wpi!araja@m2.csc.ti.com
From: araja@m2.csc.ti.com (Ali Raja)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.islam
Subject: Re: Biblical corruption - where is the evidence?
Keywords: Islam, corruption, when?, where?, who?, manuscripts, archeology
Message-ID: <7588@wpi.wpi.edu>
Date: 2 Feb 90 20:28:28 GMT
References: <7364@wpi.wpi.edu>
Sender: shari@wpi.wpi.edu
Lines: 19
Approved: shari@wpi.edu


In article <7364@wpi.wpi.edu> bakken@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Bakken) writes:

>I'm curious about this.  I've heard Muslims say this, but they never 
>seem to have any details (consider how slanderous and blasphemous 
>they would consider it if someone had voiced similar questions as to
>the validity of the Qua'ran or Mohammed, even if details were provided).

I think you have a fundamental misconception about Islam.  If someone
voiced similar question about the validity of  the Quran or of Mohammed
without anything to support his statements; then he would most likely
be simply ignored.  If he provided details then these details would be
closely examined.  All adherents to any particular religion claim that 
their religion has been challenged and that the challenge was fruitless.

So, at the risk of braggadocio, I'll ask you the same.  Can you really
provide any details that show that the Quran is corrupted?  It seems to
me that your own faith demands that this corruption exist. Can you
point out to us where this is?