Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!SUNRISE!POSTMASTER
From: POSTMASTER@SUNRISE.BITNET (Edward A. Lyon)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Subject: Routing Table Differences
Message-ID: <NODMGT-L%90021211132688@MARIST.BITNET>
Date: 12 Feb 90 16:10:00 GMT
Sender: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Reply-To: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Lines: 11
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
Original_To:  BITNET%"NodMgt-L@Marist"

These nodes were in the LINKS002 file but NOT in the NETINIT file:

                DBNVB12, HROEUR1A, HROEUR1B

These nodes were in the NETINIT file but NOT in the LINKS002 file:

        AWIIEZ44, DS0IFU57, FIRIEN, FRNSAE11, HEARNVAX,
        HEITUE52, NOBSCVM, TNEARN, TRHUN, VERS9002


Aside from the comments and the node order, those were the only differences.