Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!WVNVM!U0A61
From: U0A61@WVNVM.BITNET (Bryan, Jerry)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Subject: Routing tables from pathalias
Message-ID: <NODMGT-L%90021213272586@BITNIC.BITNET>
Date: 12 Feb 90 18:22:31 GMT
Sender: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Reply-To: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Lines: 7
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
X-Acknowledge-To: <U0A61@WVNVM>
In-Reply-To:  Message of 02/12/90 at 10:42:14 from GETTES@PUCC.BITNET

The discussion of the Princeton proposal for reorganizing BITNET nodes and
using VMNET was moved over to NODMGT-L, to which I duly subscribed.
Ever since, I have had about 50 notes per day discussing pathalias and
GENROUTES and so forth which I would really rather not see.  Could I
persuade anybody to move the discussion of the Princeton proposal back
to POLICY-L or BITNET-2 or somewhere so I can get off NODMGT-L but
still follow the discussion of the Princeton proposal?