Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!SPCVXA!TERRY
From: TERRY@SPCVXA.BITNET (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Subject: Re: Oops, forgotten list of missing :routtabs
Message-ID: <DEC8779FA6BF005E2A@SPCVXA.BITNET>
Date: 10 Feb 90 07:39:00 GMT
Sender: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Reply-To: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Lines: 17
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
X-Organization: St. Peter's College, US
X-Envelope-to: nodmgt-l@BITNIC.BITNET
X-VMS-To: in%"nodmgt-l@bitnic"
X-VMS-Cc: TERRY


  Your message came through a bit garbled, let me see...

> get the original file?

  If you mean the original posting which omitted the actual node list, yes I
received it.

> No :routtab tags were generated for mail-only nodes.

  If we've reached closure on the discussion ov valid values for :routtab, do
you think I should submit update requests to include :routtab.NONE fields for
my nodes? (And yes, NONE is appropriate - these nodes maintain no routing
tables locally - all mail is verified via DECnet connection to the mailer on
SPCVXA, which has the real tables).

        Terry Kennedy