Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!UNIX!CMF
From: cmf@UNIX.CIS.PITT.EDU (Carl M. Fongheiser)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Subject: Re: Pathalias, Genroutes, and topologies...
Message-ID: <UZpNxIg_V000AKI1Uo@unix.cis.pitt.edu>
Date: 11 Feb 90 17:25:09 GMT
References: <9002110929.AA27533@unix.cis.pitt.edu>
Sender: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Reply-To: Node Management Discussion <NODMGT-L@BITNIC>
Lines: 7
Approved: NETNEWS@PSUVM Gateway
X-Envelope-to: NODMGT-L@UGA.BITNET
In-Reply-To:  <9002110929.AA27533@unix.cis.pitt.edu>

Yes, we should be concerned about how these new programs jibe with LSVBITFD.
That's *not* the most critical consideration, however.  We need to make sure
that the use of these different route generators throughout BITNET/EARN/NETNORTH
doesn't cause any routing loops.  *That* would be a true disaster.

                                Carl Fongheiser
                                University of Pittsburgh