Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!AUVM!KWILCOX From: KWILCOX@AUVM.BITNET (ken wilcox) Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics Subject: Re: Just the facts Ma'am.... Message-ID: <90039.0243.KWILCOX@AUVM> Date: 8 Feb 90 02:43:28 GMT Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics Reply-To: Forum for the Discussion of Politics Lines: 32 Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM Gateway In-Reply-To: Message of Sat, 3 Feb 90 12:50:00 CST from On Sat, 3 Feb 90 12:50:00 CST said: >>I believe also it is a journalists duty to check up on facts to >>see if they are truthful. When Bush says he knows nothing (That >>was terminal in Ronnie!) is a fact in him saying it. However, it >>is also a fact if the President is not being truthful in his statements. >>I believe a problem with reporters is that they have not been willing >>to question statements of people. It is easier to take people's statements >>at face value than check up on them >> >>Ken Wilcox > >Careful!! There is a difference between reporting the facts and editorializing >them. The fact that he said it is news, the fact, assuming that you can prove >it, that he lied in saying it is news, BUT, reporting that you THINK he is >lying is editorializing. I would have just the facts and make my own decision >on what I THINK IS THE TRUTH. I despise the editorializing on TV that follows >ANY political happening, speech or whatever. If it is on TV you will get a >dozen people telling you what they thought he meant. I like to chew my own >food, thank you. The point I am getting at is the danger of journalists being coopted into the political system by relying on the words of politicians only. It is a credibility question of the reporter and what is reported. My experience is newspapers is the op/ed section. True that is where the TRUTH is discussed. However, a statement that is misleading or wrong by a politician is a fact, untruthful fact. I prefer too have truthful facts to make judgements on TRUTH. Ken Wilcox Chew chew munch munch... > >Paul E. Mason