Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!BROWNVM!PL436000 From: PL436000@BROWNVM.BITNET (Jamie) Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics Subject: View from the moon Message-ID: <90040.1403.PL436000@BROWNVM> Date: 9 Feb 90 14:03:55 GMT Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics Reply-To: Forum for the Discussion of Politics Lines: 22 Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM Gateway Jimbo says, > I want no such thing! [viz., legal protection for capitalist > control of the workplace] I want legal protection for negotiation > of mutually acceptible terms. So do I! What we disagree about is which bargaining positions are legally to be backed up as background to the negotiations. > Tell me how it is that you think that companies which are less > profitable will continue to dominate. Tell me how you think the more profitable ones will dominate. IBM, less profitable than scads of smaller companies, continues to dominate its market. > I guess I can mark Harvard off my list of job prospects... sigh... Ken will retire soon. Anyway, all those Reagan Technocrats are looking for a new ideology. Maybe you can sell Epstein or someone on this Austrian thing. (But better hope Sen doesn't find out you think there is no such thing as cardinal utility.) ^^^^^^Jamie^^^^^^