Path: utzoo!utgpu!ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca!CUVMA!SWL-L
Date:	Fri, 9 Feb 90 01:48:23 EST
Reply-To: Evan Biff Henderson Eickmeyer <zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!chaph.usc.edu!alcor.usc.edu!eickmeye@THINK.COM>
Sender: Short Wave Listener's List <SWL-L%CUVMA.bitnet@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was
From:	Evan Biff Henderson Eickmeyer <zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!chaph.usc.edu!alcor.usc.edu!eickmeye@THINK.COM>
Subject:      Re: Today's FCC Meeting (8 Feb 90):  Quick Summary
X-To:         swl-l@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:	UofToronto LAN redistribution <SWL-L%UTORGPU.bitnet@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <90Feb9.081556est.57612@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Newsgroups: bitnet.swl-l
Distribution: ut
Approved: devnull@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu

In article <16058@well.sf.ca.us> rh@well.sf.ca.us (Robert Horvitz) writes:
[...]
>Finally, FCC Chairman Alfred Sikes announced that the Commission
>would hold a "field hearing" next Monday (12 February 1990) in
>Los Angeles at City Hall.  This is the first such formal meeting
>outside of Washington "in living memory," Sikes said, and it
>reflects the Commission's interest in hearing "points of view
>that wouldn't necessarily be represented here in Washington."

Does anyone have any more information about the Los Angeles meeting?
I will call the FCC field office tomorrow to inquire and post the
results, if no one else has done so by then.  I think this is an
opportunity too good for us in the L.A. area to pass up (as long as
it doesn't mean missing work, school I can miss! :-)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           "I can't complain, but sometimes I still do" -- Joe Walsh
Evan "Biff Henderson" Eickmeyer               University of Southern California
eickmeye@alcor.usc.edu                                  Los Angeles, California