Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mtxinu!frk
From: frk@mtxinu.COM (Frank Korzeniewski)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Next computer (Re: CISC Silent Spring)
Message-ID: <1119@mtxinu.UUCP>
Date: 7 Feb 90 03:00:05 GMT
References: <8905@portia.Stanford.EDU>
Reply-To: frk@mtxinu.UUCP (Frank Korzeniewski)
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: mt Xinu, Berkeley
Lines: 16

In article <8905@portia.Stanford.EDU> underdog@portia.Stanford.EDU (Dwight Joe) writes:
>
>|<I know.  Steve's going to upgrade the NEXT to a 68040.
>|<Even then, the Sparc chip set is faster.
>|
>|How do you know that?  Have you benchmarked a 68040?
>
>source: Businessweek

WOW!  The definitive source for technical information!

I read in EE Times that the 68040 is faster than the Sparc.

But after all, what do they know.  They are only some technoid rag.

Frank Korzeniewski     (frk@mtxinu.com)