Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: "Bob.Izenberg" Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Remote Broadcast Lines (was: Rochester Telephone) Message-ID: <3793@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 12 Feb 90 07:24:55 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Reply-To: "Bob.Izenberg" Organization: Somewhere in Austin, Texas Lines: 22 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 96, message 5 of 10 In article <3738@accuvax.nwu.edu> Robert Gutierrez writes: >It's unfortunate that you can't use celluar phones for 'Remote >Broadcast' without an STA (Special Temp. Authority) (does the FCC plan >on changing it's mind about this soon???), but you can use some device >made by Wenger (or was it Cetec?) that basically companded an audio >line, 'split' it in 1/2, and used 2 normal voice grade telco lines >(read: regular telephone calls), and provided 7.5khz of bandwidth at >the distant end. Back in 1982, Comrex had a frequency extender that got 5khz flat response, more or less, out of a regular voice grade line. There were a couple of models, but each was basically an audio mixer for three or five inputs, for a few mics and a cart machine. I'm sure that it's old hat by now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bob Izenberg [ ] attctc,rpp386,cs.utexas.edu!puzzle!bei ------------------------------------------------------------------------------