Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!lanl!lambda!jlg
From: jlg@lambda.UUCP (Jim Giles)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Common subexpression optimization
Message-ID: <14239@lambda.UUCP>
Date: 13 Feb 90 19:19:22 GMT
References: <2858@pkmab.se>
Lines: 11

From article <2858@pkmab.se>, by ske@pkmab.se (Kristoffer Eriksson):
> [...]
> (And if you found the initial assignment to p (p = &a[0][0]) hard to
> read, that's no argument against my example, because Jim's should have
> read so too. Just saying "p = &a" is wrong. [...]

I'll have to look at my example again, but I don't think I said just:
"p = &a".  What I thought I said was: "p = (int *) &a", which is
correct.  If I forgot the cast, I apologize.

J. Giles