Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!reed!lauren
From: lauren@reed.UUCP (Lauren Wiener)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Subject: Re: Future evolution of Smalltalk-80
Summary: Color Smalltalk paper reference
Message-ID: <14115@reed.UUCP>
Date: 10 Feb 90 04:12:51 GMT
References: <6836@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>
Distribution: comp.lang.smalltalk
Organization: Reed College, Portland OR
Lines: 14

In article <6836@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>, jans@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Jan Steinman) writes:

>What do you mean, "much awaited"?  A solid color model has been available in 
>Tek Smalltalk since 1986!  Over two person-years went into Tek Color Smalltalk,
>with much of that spent on building a layered architecture.  Personally, I'd 
>love to see the portable part become a standard, but there's NIH to deal with. 
>There was a paper, but it's not in OOPSLA '86, '87, or '89.  (I don't have '88 
>handy, and it might be in JOOP.  Rebecca Wirfs-Brock, Mike Miller, and Roxanne 
>Rochat were the authors.)

The reference is:
"An Integrated Color Smalltalk-80 System," by Rebecca Wirfs-Brock,
OOPSLA '88 Conference Proceedings, pp. 71-82.
(Also SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 23, No. 11, November, '88.)