Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!lll-winken!decwrl!limbo!taylor From: taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com (Dave Taylor) Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm Subject: Re: [nosave] in outgoing messages... Message-ID: <397@limbo.Intuitive.Com> Date: 12 Feb 90 19:27:06 GMT References: <29101@amdcad.AMD.COM> <1990Feb12.140134.22356@cs.dal.ca> Reply-To: taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com (Dave Taylor) Organization: Intuitive Systems, Mountain View, CA: +011 (415) 966-1151 Lines: 40 In article <1990Feb12.140134.22356@cs.dal.ca> bill@biomel.UUCP writes: > In article <29101@amdcad.AMD.COM> indra@amdcad.AMD.COM (Indra Singhal) writes: >> I tried what Dave suggested about adding [nosave] as part of the text of >> the message to prevent it from being appended to the =sent file. It did >> not work. > > I hear a lot of complaints about this not working. The correct syntax > is that there must be a space, i.e. [no save]. It might be worth > expanding the ELM syntax not to be so picky, given the number of > problems this causes. A curious change: Check out my source to version 2.01 gamma: in "savecopy.c", about 160 lines into the file: if (strncmp(buffer, DONT_SAVE, strlen(DONT_SAVE)) == 0 || strncmp(buffer, DONT_SAVE2, strlen(DONT_SAVE2)) == 0) { /* second test added due to an imcompatability between the documentation and the software! (Thanks Bill!) */ fclose(message); fclose(save); chown(savename, userid, groupid); return(TRUE); } where, in "defs.h", DONT_SAVE and DONT_SAVE2 are defined as: #define DONT_SAVE "[no save]" #define DONT_SAVE2 "[nosave]" As you can see, it used to like either of 'em. Any scoop on why someone would have changed that?? -- Dave Taylor Intuitive Systems Mountain View, California taylor@limbo.intuitive.com or {uunet!}{decwrl,apple}!limbo!taylor