Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!east!sunbow.Sun.COM!crl
From: crl@sunbow.Sun.COM (Charles LaBrec)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mush
Subject: Re: xmush?
Message-ID: <1543@east.East.Sun.COM>
Date: 11 Feb 90 05:28:04 GMT
References: <349@icjapan.uucp> <48778707.12c9a@digital.sps.mot.com> <1542@east.East.Sun.COM>
Sender: news@east.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: crl@sunbow.Sun.COM (Charles LaBrec)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.  Albany, NY
Lines: 13

In article <1542@east.East.Sun.COM> crl@sunbow.east.Sun.COM (Charles LaBrec) writes:
>                       ...  I think it should conform to whatever that
>platform uses, whether it be Motif, OpenLook, NeXTStep, etc.
>                                              ^^^^^^^^

Oops, I know NeXTStep is not X-based.  I was thinking in broader
terms: a window-based mush should conform to the platform's
look-and-feel, no matter what the window protocol is.


Charles LaBrec
Sun Professional Services
Albany, NY