Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!simpact!jeh
From: jeh@simpact.com
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: UUCP G protocol and time/file limits
Message-ID: <913.25cedb49@simpact.com>
Date: 6 Feb 90 22:12:25 GMT
References: <isfa379ui@tmsoft.uucp> <890.25c97988@simpact.com> <248@herron.uucp>
Organization: Simpact Associates, San Diego CA
Lines: 18

In article <248@herron.uucp>, jbrown@herron.uucp (Jordan Brown) writes:
> jeh@simpact.com writes:
>> mshiels@tmsoft.uucp (Michael A. Shiels) writes:
>> > Are there any SAFE responses to a 'S x x x' command which will have the
>> > other system keep the file and try it again when things free up....
> 
>> I'd like to know this too.  And, if there isn't such a response, there
>> ought to be!  Can we assign one?  
> 
> We can assign one all we like.  Changing the N thousand copies of uucico
> out there to understand the new code is the hard part.

I'd guessed that, actually... :-)

	--- Jamie Hanrahan, Simpact Associates, San Diego CA
Chair, VMSnet [DECUS uucp] and Internals Working Groups, DECUS VAX Systems SIG 
Internet:  jeh@simpact.com, or if that fails, jeh@crash.cts.com
Uucp:  ...{crash,scubed,decwrl}!simpact!jeh