Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!bloom-beacon!mintaka!yale!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!ncr-sd!ncrcae!secola!syackey
From: syackey@secola.Columbia.NCR.COM (Steve Yackey)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: tcp/ip for 386 UNIX
Message-ID: <483@secola.Columbia.NCR.COM>
Date: 8 Feb 90 16:58:51 GMT
References: <5645@ncrcae.Columbia.NCR.COM> <1990Feb2.154728.17877@ico.isc.com> <825@unix386.Convergent.COM> <ADNAN.90Feb6170824@sgtech.UUCP> <HWAJIN.90Feb7104552@ganges.wrs.com>
Reply-To: syackey@secola.UUCP (PUT YOUR NAME HERE)
Organization: NCR Comten Columbia
Lines: 7

In article <HWAJIN.90Feb7104552@ganges.wrs.com> hwajin@ganges.wrs.com (Hwa Jin Bae) writes:
>In article <ADNAN.90Feb6170824@sgtech.UUCP> adnan@sgtech.UUCP (Adnan Yaqub) writes:

>The Wollongong stuff is based on the LAI TCP/IP stuff.  I know cause I've
>looked at the sources.

Are you sure its not as simple as having a common ancestor ?