Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!netserv2!deven From: deven@rpi.edu (Deven T. Corzine) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: YANQ Message-ID: Date: 10 Feb 90 00:13:28 GMT References: <42700026@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <42700027@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <9563@cbmvax.commodore.com> Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY Lines: 31 In-Reply-To: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com's message of 1 Feb 90 16:35:33 GMT In article <42700027@m.cs.uiuc.edu> schwager@m.cs.uiuc.edu writes: schwager> I will, however, continue to doubt the 1.1 RKM's, and as schwager> soon as I'm done following The The on the Midwestern leg of schwager> their tour (I'm gonna be a The-head :-), I'll save up and schwager> buy the 1.2 RKM's. Hopefully they'll have less head-bashing schwager> fodder in them. On 1 Feb 90 16:35:33 GMT, peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) said: Peter> I hope you mean 1.3. There never were a set a 1.2 RKM's (there Peter> was some 1.2 technical info in the 1.2 Enhancer Manual). I Peter> hope you are running the 1.3 software too, there still are some Peter> folks who have 1.2 (or 1.1 (or 1.0!))) Sure there were! What about the RKMs published by Addison-Wesley, with the dopy little pictures of a mouse or something, and a colored bar across near the top? They had 1.2 functions in them... The volumes were "RKM: Exec", "RKM: Intuition", "RKM: Libraries and Devices" and "RKM: Hardware Reference Manual". But I agree no one should look to buy 1.2 RKMs *now* with the wonderful 1.3 RKMs out now. (Excellent job, guys, esp. on L&D...) Deven -- Deven T. Corzine Internet: deven@rpi.edu, shadow@pawl.rpi.edu Snail: 2151 12th St. Apt. 4, Troy, NY 12180 Phone: (518) 274-0327 Bitnet: deven@rpitsmts, userfxb6@rpitsmts UUCP: uunet!rpi!deven Simple things should be simple and complex things should be possible.