Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!pro-graphics.cts.com!elund
From: elund@pro-graphics.cts.com (Eric Lund)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Wanted: good C environment
Message-ID: <1401@crash.cts.com>
Date: 8 Feb 90 09:36:39 GMT
Sender: root@crash.cts.com
Lines: 16

In-Reply-To: message from ellard@bbn.com

First off, Microsoft C doesn't have an environment.  It's baby, Quick C
(included) does.  I've never been impressed much by Microsoft's editors. 
Borland is alright, if you learn the Wordstar command set.  As for the
environment in general, I use Turbo C prolifically, and have gotten used to
it.  No rave reviews, but I'm picky when it comes to environments, editors and
interfaces.  Turbo C also compiles quicker than Microsoft or Quick C, which
contributes to a more sleek environment.

Eric

 ProLine: elund@pro-graphics
    UUCP: ...crash!pro-graphics!elund
ARPA/DDN: pro-graphics!elund@nosc.mil
Internet: elund@pro-graphics.cts.com