Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen
From: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: 386 C compiler (Unix,MSC)/ 386 box recommendations?
Message-ID: <468@sixhub.UUCP>
Date: 11 Feb 90 22:21:31 GMT
References: <750@npiatl.UUCP> <286@intek01.UUCP> <3576@uceng.UC.EDU>
Reply-To: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Distribution: comp
Organization: *IX Public Access UNIX, Schenectady NY
Lines: 14

In article <3576@uceng.UC.EDU> mfinegan@uceng.UC.EDU (michael k finegan) writes:
| 
| We just installed SCO Unix on our 386, and I noticed a dramatic improvement
| for 'rcc' versus MSC 5.1 (~2/3 execution time). Anyone compare rcc to other 32
| bit compilers ?

  Interesting... I have timed things compiled with MSC against things
compiled with cc under ix/386 (the xenix executables run there) and the
MSC was almost always somewhat faster.
-- 
	bill davidsen - sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX
davidsen@sixhub.uucp		...!uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen

"Getting old is bad, but it beats the hell out of the alternative" -anon