Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!bloom-beacon!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-sdd!ncr-sd!se-sd!drew
From: drew@se-sd.NCR.COM (Drew Lettington)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: SCO Xenix vs Interactive 386/ix
Message-ID: <2384@se-sd.NCR.COM>
Date: 8 Feb 90 19:15:40 GMT
Reply-To: drew@se-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Drew Lettington)
Organization: NCR Corporation, SE-San Diego
Lines: 16


    I am currently in the process of setting up a development envrionment
which will eventually link NCR Tower, NCR ITX and PC systems.  File transfer
will be accomplished using TCP/IP.  I would like to have NFS or RFS in the
future.  What I am wondering is if anyone has had any experience using
either SCO's Xenix or Interactive's 386/ix operating system?  Which costs
less, which has better performance, which is easier to use?  Any info you
have will be greatly appreciated.

    Please reply via e-mail.  I will post a summary of all comments I
receive.

-- 
     drew@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM        |    Olga Corbet drives me mad 
     Drew Lettington                    |    I'll buy some vodka for her dad
     NCR Systems Engineering San Diego  |    -- Jazz Butcher