Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!jarthur!polyslo!vlsi3b15!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!sei.cmu.edu!krvw
From: woody@rpp386.cactus.org (Woodrow Baker)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: Re: WDEF in Toronto (MAC)
Message-ID: <0012.9002121947.AA15751@ge.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 9 Feb 90 02:29:05 GMT
Sender: Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@IBM1.CC.Lehigh.EDU>
Lines: 19
Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu

ADAMS@HUMBER.BITNET (Kevin Adams) writes:
>
> >From the reports I've read NVIR and WDEF both have no malicious
> intent, and that any damage they cause are 'side effects'.  Is this
> accurate?
>
> It seems very strange to me that Virus writers would launch
> their missiles with no payload...

Not really,  Perhaps they are
1.	General test cases to see how effective an attack method is
2.	A somewhat responsible virus writer, who likes the chllenge
	but would not want to cause damage.
3.	Someone who stood a chance f getting discovered, and figured
	that if it was a benign virus, the legal troubles would be less.

All of the above would be valid reasons not to make it lethal...
Cheers
Woody