Xref: utzoo comp.unix.i386:2933 comp.windows.x:18383
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386,comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: X on the 386
Message-ID: <=SQ1077xds13@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 13 Feb 90 21:02:47 GMT
References: <1990Feb12.180931.1093@aqdata.uucp> <1990Feb13.031759.1777@tah386.manhattan.ks.us>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 16

In article <1990Feb13.031759.1777@tah386.manhattan.ks.us> terry@tah386.manhattan.ks.us (Terry Hull) writes:
> [for X] Minimum of 8 MB.

I've used X with 4 Meg, which was OK for 4 or 5 XTERM windows, but no good
for real X applications.

> Yes.  AT&T also has an X product.

Also, X is available from Intel for their V.3.2 version.

> >Are there any Open Look development packages available on the 386?
> Not that I'm aware of.  SCO's stuff will be heavily slanted toward Motif. 

Intel's stuff comes with a bogus OpenLook style window manager, that
convinced me (if I needed convincing) that Open Look isn't what I want on
*my* screen.
-- 
 _--_|\  Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.uu.net>.
/      \
\_.--._/ Xenix Support -- it's not just a job, it's an adventure!
      v  "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-'