Path: utzoo!utgpu!alliant.com!UUCP Reply-To: british-cars@alliant.com Errors-To: british-cars-request@alliant.com Sender: british-cars-request@alliant.com Return-Path: Date: Tue, 6 Feb 90 12:11:38 EST Message-ID: <1426.25CF865A@busker.FIDONET.ORG> From: George.Emery@p42.f4.n105.z1.fidonet.org (George Emery) Subject: Re: Mini vs. MG1100 To: utah-cs!hoosier!sol@cs.utexas.edu X-Mailer: mailout v1.26 released Newsgroups: list.british-cars Distribution: ut Approved: devnull@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu > The MG1100 did however, as far as I can recall, used an > A-unit engine diplacing 1098cc which was one of the few capacities not used > in the Mini. The Mini Clubman used the 1098cc engine. > The front suspensions were pretty much the same for both and > could be interchanged. No, you cannot interchange them because the geometry is different. If they could be interchanged, it would be a source for some excellent disc brakes! -- George Emery - via FidoNet node 1:105/14 UUCP: ...!{uunet!oresoft, tektronix!reed}!busker!4.42!George.Emery ARPA: George.Emery@p42.f4.n105.z1.FIDONET.ORG