Path: utzoo!utgpu!ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca!UTORONTO!HUMANIST Date: Thu, 8 Feb 90 21:33:23 EST Reply-To: Willard McCarty Sender: HUMANIST Discussion From: Willard McCarty Subject: 3.1022 Mac/IBM and writing, cont. (41) To: "Humanists at Toronto" Message-ID: <90Feb8.220422est.58600@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca> Newsgroups: list.humanist Distribution: ut Approved: devnull@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 3, No. 1022. Thursday, 8 Feb 1990. (1) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 90 15:43:00 EST (12 lines) From: KESSLER Subject: Re: 3.1011 the quality of writing is (not) machined (74) (2) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 90 04:00:00 EST (9 lines) From: EIEB360@UTXVM Subject: 3.1011 the quality of writing is (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 90 15:43:00 EST From: KESSLER Subject: Re: 3.1011 the quality of writing is (not) machined (74) Fro Jim O'donnell. I solved that problme long ago: Data desk Intrnational's key board for the various macs is both comfrotable and splendid to use, and tactile ly very satisfactoryindeed, and it offers macros and programs to speed up all s ort os your work too, with software that acesses at one stroke anything you lik e and everything that usually takes 4-5 steps to access. Kessler at UCLA, and i t is cheaper if ordered from the discount telephone warehouses, and they have t ech support too by phone, when you can get Teresa, say, in Van Nuys.... (2) --------------------------------------------------------------20---- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 90 04:00:00 EST From: EIEB360@UTXVM Subject: 3.1011 the quality of writing is Bob Kessler, Others too have suggested (is "Others too" redundant? sure sounds like it. Oh well) that Halio must have had some prior animus against the Mac, some hidden agenda; I don't see it, myself-- I just think she's flat wrong, and that the paper's a sloppy job. John Slatin