Path: utzoo!utgpu!ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca!NDSUVM1!NETNWS-L
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 90 03:59:17 EST
Reply-To: NETNWS-L Netnews List <NETNWS-L%NDSUVM1.bitnet@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Sender: NETNWS-L Netnews List <NETNWS-L%NDSUVM1.bitnet@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
From:	Chris Wooff <QQ43@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: Unix folks unhappy about bit groups
To:	UofToronto LAN redistribution <NETNWS-L%UTORGPU.bitnet@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
References:  Your message of Mon, 12 Feb 90 17:28:00 EST
Message-ID: <90Feb13.041048est.57480@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Newsgroups: list.netnws-l
Distribution: ut
Approved: devnull@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu

I'd certainly be  unhappy if we were unable to  receive the bit.* groups.
One of the  reasons for getting Netnews  was to make it  simpler and more
efficient  for our  users to  access  the information  on those  LISTSERV
lists. However,  I do appreciate  that the Message-Id:  duplication ought
not to take place.