Xref: utzoo news.admin:8297 news.groups:17686 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups Subject: Re: alt.rant? (Re: Flames) Message-ID: <1PP18IFxds13@ficc.uu.net> Date: 12 Feb 90 12:51:58 GMT References: <38193@apple.Apple.COM> <1746@dukeac.UUCP> <3YO1.E5xds13@ficc.uu.net> Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 11 In article tale@cs.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) writes: > Golly gee, Beaver, that would really burn 'em up, wouldn't it? > Something really mean like that would really force a change around here. Well, it'd at least stop the debate over what is or isn't a flame. > So why do you suggest alt.rant? It's a joke, son. I never explain jokes any more. PS: what's purple and commutes? -- _--_|\ Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. . / \ \_.--._/ Xenix Support -- it's not just a job, it's an adventure! v "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-'