Xref: utzoo news.groups:17500 rec.models.rc:2474 rec.models.rockets:610 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!iuvax!mailrus!ncar!tank!jill From: jill@tank.uchicago.edu (jill holly hansen) Newsgroups: news.groups,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets Subject: Re: First week of voting: rec.models.misc Message-ID: <7518@tank.uchicago.edu> Date: 8 Feb 90 20:31:38 GMT References: <1990Feb8.192312.28089@uokmax.uucp> Organization: The University of Chicago, not the U of IL Lines: 34 In article <1990Feb8.192312.28089@uokmax.uucp> randy@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (Longshot) writes: : :At the end of one week of voting, the tally is 38 yes votes to 5 no votes. :Please vote if you have not. If there are not at least 100 more yes votes :than no votes, this group will not pass. Right now, I get the impression that :I may not even get 100 votes *total*. : :And the voters thus far: : :1 no vote :Benjamin Chase :Charleen Bunjiovianna :Chris Krieg :Dag Bruck Would some net guru jump in on this one! I believe that netiquette is that 1) One does not report mid term results 2) For mid-term acknowlegments, only only acknowledges that a vote was received, one doesn't at this point indicate how an individual noted. That comes at the end. What with this proble, bouncing votes, the infamous *.aquaria vote, and some questionable counts, wouldn't it be nice if somone had the ability to donate enough disk space on her machine so that ALL votes went to one machine, were counted by someone independent and reported correctly? -- ======================================================================== Jill Hansen | Can you imagine what this world be like jill@tank.uchicago.edu | if God's operating system were Unix?