Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!uudell!bigtex!pmafire!geoff
From: geoff@pmafire.UUCP (Geoff Allen)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Splitting hairs in (was RE: Splitting Comp.Sys.Mac again)
Summary: I don't like comp.sys.mac.software
Message-ID: <1180@pmafire.UUCP>
Date: 8 Feb 90 16:02:00 GMT
References: <38423@apple.Apple.COM> <1990Feb7.235821.7263@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> <38443@apple.Apple.COM>
Reply-To: geoff@pmafire.UUCP (Geoff Allen)
Organization: WINCO Computer Engineering, INEL, Idaho
Lines: 19


A couple of people in this thread have suggested comp.sys.mac.software. 
I'm not too sure about this.

If we follow these proposals, we'd have comp.sys.mac.hardware and
comp.sys.mac.software.  That seems to cover everything.  What's left for
comp.sys.mac.misc?  I don't see how it would solve anything.

The more I think about it, the more I like comp.sys.mac.misc and
comp.sys.mac.talk with a monthly ``Welcome'' posting to explain the
groups and answer a few of the more common questions.

I'll draft something up and post it to comp.sys.mac in the near future
for people to comment on.  We'll see if we can get this going.

-- 
Geoff Allen                  \  The good thing about standards is there
{uunet|bigtex}!pmafire!geoff  \  are so many to choose from.
ucdavis!egg-id!pmafire!geoff   \   -- Jean-Louis Gassee, Apple Computer