Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!neat.cs.toronto.edu!omicron.cs.fsu.edu!fsucs.cs.fsu.edu!peterson
Newsgroups: news.groups
From: peterson@fsucs.cs.fsu.edu (Eric J Peterson)
Subject: Re: First week of voting: rec.models.misc
Message-ID: <9002082233.AA08881@fsucs.cs.fsu.edu>
Reply-To: peterson@nu.cs.fsu.edu (Eric J Peterson)
Organization: Florida State University Computer Science Department
References: <1990Feb8.192312.28089@uokmax.uucp>
Date: 8 Feb 90 22:33:14 GMT
Lines: 27

In article <1990Feb8.192312.28089@uokmax.uucp>, randy@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (Longshot) writes:
| 
| At the end of one week of voting, the tally is 38 yes votes to 5 no votes.
| Please vote if you have not. If there are not at least 100 more yes votes
| than no votes, this group will not pass. Right now, I get the impression that
| I may not even get 100 votes *total*. Below is the list of voters (sorted
| alphabetically by header). The very first person who sent me a no vote, had
| a message with a munged header. Thus, I have the line "1 no vote" in his/her
| place.

Doesn't this go against the guidelines a wee bit in two or three ways?  I
didn't think that intermediate results were supposed to be posted, just the
list of people that had voted to confirm that votes were received ...

At any rate, I tried to vote but my mail keeps bouncing off of uokmax's
Sendmail (I'm using Sendmail 5.61 and haven't had a problem with it until
now).  Perhaps this is why the turnout is so poor ... ?

YES to r.m.m.

Eric

-- 
  Eric J. Peterson <> peterson@nu.cs.fsu.edu <> uunet!nu.cs.fsu.edu!peterson
Florida State Univ * CS Systems Support Group * Room 011 Love * (904) 644-2296
       echo "This is not a pipe." | lpr -P laserjet; more ~/.disclaimer