Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uhccux!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!snorkelwacker!apple!cambridge.apple.com!gz
From: gz@cambridge.apple.com (Gail Zacharias)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Splitting Comp.Sys.Mac again (was Re: Too many messages in ....)
Message-ID: <162@brazil.cambridge.apple.com>
Date: 8 Feb 90 05:34:52 GMT
References: <1688@xn.LL.MIT.EDU>
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 15

In article <1688@xn.LL.MIT.EDU> delaney@xn (John R. Delaney) writes:
>comp.sys.mac.fonts

I like that.  More generally, how about comp.sys.mac.desktop-publishing?

All the suggested splits into general categories like "comp.sys.mac.inits" are
useless.  The only purpose of splitting off a subgroup is to allow people to
NOT read it.  Why would anybody NOT read "c.s.m.inits"??  I mean do you really
care HOW your software goes about doing whatever it was you wanted it to do?

Now c.s.m.fonts, that's definitely something one either does or doesn't
care about.  It would sure cut down on my c.s.m.* reading time...

--
gz@cambridge.apple.com